🇬🇧️ Increase the font size by [Ctrl]+[+]
until the forums below look good for you
(smaller with [Ctrl]+[-]), then close this box here
(click the X in its top right corner).


🇩🇪️ Erhöhe mit [Strg]+[+] die Schriftgröße,
bis die Foren unten für dich gut aussehen
(kleiner mit [Strg]+[-]), dann schließe diese Info
(klick auf das X hier oben rechts).

Topic Suggestions for Discussions

Let's improve the productivity, efficacy and efficiency of the Think-Tank, as well as its benefits-costs ratio for each contributor and helper!
Post Reply
User avatar
VoysonM
Professor General Voyson Molaskes
(Community Admin)
Professor General Voyson Molaskes<br>(Community Admin)
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 135
Joined: 4 months ago
Profile news headline: Translating the FD PDF
Has thanked: 82 times
Been thanked: 347 times

Topic Suggestions for Discussions

#1

Post by VoysonM »

Here are a few suggestions:

1. Should multiplicators and maybe also deciders be pointed directly to the TT, and if so, which ones, and what ways would be effective (consider for instance "six degrees of separation")?

2. Develop suggestions for the "marketing" and PR for the TT (reputation building, reaching target groups effectively, critical defence)

3. exercise for the Think-Tank: "Chess Moves" 1. criticism example — 2. PR/lobbyism reaction (real or fictitious) — Think-Tank counter-reaction

4. exercise: Everyone who wants to builds a (fictitious or real) example campaign with the AIDA formula (or even several campaigns).

(These topics were suggested in the old web 2.0 community between December 2020 and April 2021,
have been collected and now they've finally been copied here by me.)
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “🪜 Optimizing the Think-Tank”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Please log in or register to populate the community. and 1 guest